What Major Disagreements And Compromises Molded The Content Of The Constitution

America, as a country, has taken a big step towards what the original Constitution represented: equality for all. Lincoln saw the Civil War as a time when America could really say what freedom really was, not just for whites, but for all. One of the main compromises adopted in the drafting of the Constitution was the Connecticut compromise or the grand compromise that there would be two houses in Congress, including a House of Representatives, which had the same representation as the Senate. This compromise was made to my Roger Sherman, a delegate from Connecticut, hence the name of the Connecticut compromise. The compromise was placed because of the debate between small states like Connecticut and large states like Virginia and New Jersey. The compromise was then discussed and adopted on 16 July, it was adopted and incorporated into the new constitution of our just nation. A case in which the U.S. Supreme Court repudiated Samuel Worcester`s conviction and found that Georgia`s penal code, which prohibited non-Indians from being present on Indian lands without state authorization, was unconstitutional. During this period, what efforts were made to strengthen the nation`s economic integration and what major crises hampered these efforts? How did Andrew Jackson embody the contradictions of democratic nationalism? The differences and compromises on the conclusion of the Constitution were representation (The Great Compromise), Slavery (three-fifths compromise) and elections (electoral college). The panic of 1837 was a financial crisis in the United States, causing a great recession that lasted until the mid-1840s. Earnings, prices and wages have declined, while unemployment has increased.

The third major compromise that was discussed in the creation of our just constitution was the compromise on the slave trade. This compromise was achieved because the countries of the South feared the idea of giving power to a national government that would abolish slavery as a whole, for the many states that relied on slavery for agricultural development, which seemed to be a terrible idea. With regard to the abolition of northern slavery, they insisted that slavery be abolished in everything that irritated the southern states. As a result of this debate and agreement, Congress banned the slave trade for 20 years. This then gave the countries dependent on slavery twenty years to continue the dehumanizing trade without interruption, because for the northern states they had the idea that, in the near future, the practice of the slave trade would be abolished and totally abandoned. Thus, the states of the South receive a “grace period” during which they can continue the process of trade in human life without the consent of the individual. Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, was a case of the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that the application of military courts to citizens when civilian courts are still in use is unconstitutional.


Comments are closed.